• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

English Works

  • Home
  • Our Shop
    • Books
    • Year 12 Frameworks Crafting Texts
    • Argument Analysis
    • Year Level Packages
  • Years 7 – 10
    • Techniques of Persuasion Program
    • Become an Expert Program
      • The English Works Analytical Vocab Builder
    • Better Essays & Persuasive Techniques
    • Grammar & Language (Blue)
    • English Works Classic Short Stories by the masters
  • Years 11-12
    • Oedipus the King by Sophocles: an essay-writing guide
    • Sunset Boulevard : How to Write an A+ Essay
    • Rainbow’s End by Jane Harrison: an essay-writing guide
    • English Works Reader Blue Book
    • Year 11 & 12 Argument Analysis
      • VCE Argument Pack
      • The English Works Analytical Vocab Builder
      • VCE Section C: Suggested Responses
    • Year 12 Frameworks About Country
    • Year 12 Frameworks About Personal Journeys
      • Year 12 Frameworks About Play
      • Year 12 Frameworks About Protest
      • Crafting texts: Year 11 About Crisis
  • Classes
    • Our Classes 2026
  • Contact us

Exercise 5: 12 Angry Men 3rd and 10th Jurors

Step 1: Identify the narrator’s/author’s main points.  

12 Angry Men p 8-9Download

Step 2: Describe the 3rd and the 10th Jurors’ attitude and tone. Who or what is he criticising and why? Referring to at least three quotes, explain their purpose and their link to the character’s views.    

  • eg. contemptuous; indignant; intransigent; condescending; patronising; belittling; dismissive

Step 3: Learn new words and phrases: use in a sentence.
Learn four new expressions (words and phrases).   Write these phrases in your own sentence.

Give Quotes:

The 10th  juror has a flippant, casual, cavalier attitude towards the discussion ((reckless, indifferent)

As a spokesperson for justice, the 8th juror maintains a calm and considered approach to the boy’s trial (phlegmatic)   (unflappable) He suggests that we “owe him a few words”;   this is a criticism or an indictment of the 10th and 3rd jurors attitude – they prefer to tell “stories” and dismiss the boy’s right to be heard.

The 10th juror asks questions in a contemptuous manner; suggesting /implying that the boy does not deserve a trial that costs money, because he grew up in the slums and was brought up in an orphanage; because he is socially disadvantaged he does not deserve a fair trial.

He uses his own personal experience to cast aspersions on the boy and his “defence”; he suggests that “you can’t believe a word they say. I mean they’re born liars.”

Rose suggests that those who are bigoted and prejudiced often do not recognise their own blind spots or flawed reasons.

The 9th juror is concerned that the 10th juror presents as “ignorant” and from his bigoted perspective, implies that he has a “monopoly on the truth”

In the stage directions, Rose states that he “rises and looks around at the others” , he may be canvassing for support, but he is also intimidating the others.

Rose notes in the stage directions that the third juror “refers to his notes”;   The fact that he reads these “facts” which is nothing more than a misguided assumption about the boy who said he was “gonna kill” his father, reveals a very serious problem about his bigotted views. When he heard the thump of the body, he assumed that the boy had killed his father.

Other Exercises

Exercise 6: 12 Angry Men; 8th juror’s comments

Return to Extension Activities

Tweet

Primary Sidebar

View all Products in this Category

Cart

Search

Footer

For Sponsorship and Other Enquiries

Please contact English Works
Ph: (061) 0400 568 657
or email:jminter@englishworks.com.au
Original artwork by Kelly Bull

Keep in touch

Search

Copyright © 2026 English Works · Log in