• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

English Works

  • Home
  • Our Shop
    • Books
    • Year 12 Frameworks Crafting Texts
    • Argument Analysis
    • Year Level Packages
  • Years 7 – 10
    • Techniques of Persuasion Program
    • Become an Expert Program
      • The English Works Analytical Vocab Builder
    • Better Essays & Persuasive Techniques
    • Grammar & Language (Blue)
    • English Works Classic Short Stories by the masters
  • Years 11-12
    • Oedipus the King by Sophocles: an essay-writing guide
    • Sunset Boulevard : How to Write an A+ Essay
    • Rainbow’s End by Jane Harrison: an essay-writing guide
    • English Works Reader Blue Book
    • Year 11 & 12 Argument Analysis
      • VCE Argument Pack
      • The English Works Analytical Vocab Builder
      • VCE Section C: Suggested Responses
    • Year 12 Frameworks About Country
    • Year 12 Frameworks About Personal Journeys
      • Year 12 Frameworks About Play
      • Year 12 Frameworks About Protest
      • Crafting texts: Year 11 About Crisis
  • Classes
    • 2025 VCE Preparation Classes
      • English Works Reader Blue Book
      • English Works Analytical Vocab Builder
    • About Our Classes
  • Contact us

Lesson 3: Exercise 16, p. 38

For maximum benefit, please purchase Become an Expert + Online Exercise Programbecome an expert flyer2

Lesson 3: the author’s appeals

Exercise 16: Victim or villain? p. 38

Ms Sue Hunt: how does she present the principal and the parents?

1. Dr Coghlan is presented as the victim of a campaign waged against her by parents of the school community. (The depiction of Dr Coghlan evokes sympathy.) Ms Hunt implies that Dr Coghlan was a reputable leader but was persecuted because of her desire to introduce the “whole class approach to toilet breaks”. The fact that she was an “excellent administrator” is bound to increase our sympathy because of the unfair circumstances of her dismissal.

Ms Hunt presents members of the school community or a “band of parents” as the villains. They persecuted the principal which led to her resignation. The fact that they abused their authority and used this rule as an excuse to get rid of her is likely to incite readers’ indignation.

Mr Jim Li: how does he present the principal and the parents?

2.  Mr Li suggests that the children were humiliated and the school community was the victim. The use of figurative language to show that the school has been left to “lick its wounds” presents the school as severely wounded by the principal’s approach.fat man

Mr Li suggests that Dr Coglan is the villain who was responsible for humiliating students. The colloquial reference to the “last straw” captures the parent’s frustration at the fact that the decision invaded the children’s personal space and possibly harmed their confidence. The author depicts Dr Coglan as autocratic, who harmed the school community by her divisive rules.

Now, see if you can write two paragraphs comparing and contrasting their analysis of the relevant stakeholders and their values.  See relevant comments and paragraph plans.

  1. Go to Lesson 3: the author’s appeals
  2. Go to Lesson 4: the author’s reasons
  3. Return to Green Online Exercise Program

 
If you wish to download the exercises for immediate use, please click here to access a PDF version. This consists of all exercises featured on this page.

Tweet

Primary Sidebar

View all Products in this Category

Cart

Search

Footer

For Sponsorship and Other Enquiries

Please contact English Works
Ph: (061) 0400 568 657
or email:jminter@englishworks.com.au
Original artwork by Kelly Bull

Keep in touch

Search

Copyright © 2025 English Works · Log in